I Know Whodunnit

Maybe my dream is finally coming true, and I’m turning into Nancy Drew!

I’m here on Deep-Fried Friday once again, talking about story.

One of the drawbacks of reading a lot of mysteries is that you start being able to guess the killer. With surprising accuracy at times.

I was recently watching a season one episode of Bones (catching up with Netflix) and halfway through I said to myself, “That guy did it.” The next twenty minutes were filled with FBI Special Agent Booth and Forensic Anthropologist Brennen searching down other leads until they finally came around to my way of thinking and arrested the right guy. It was the third episode in a row where I had guessed the killer before the main characters figured it out.

I’d fault the writers of Bones, except that it happens with books and other shows too. I no longer fall for the red herrings like I used to. I can pull out relevant facts and ignore the irrelevant ones. I make relationship connections early on the story that inform me on motive and opportunity. I notice details.

Does this happen to you too?

Presumably, one of the worst things an author can do is write a predictable story. Twists and turns are considered a good thing. Rabbit trails are good fodder for the tale. Unexpected discoveries and surprise endings should keep us turning the pages.

However, the author simply cannot account for the reader’s part in all of this. What if your reader has consumed 200 romance novels and is now reading yours? Do you think she’ll foretell how the two will get together? No matter how well you’ve written your story, she might.

And if there is no way she possibly could predict, you might be hiding information from your reader that would help them connect to the story better. I don’t like being completely in the dark, like the author is being all cagey about releasing information just in case I might get ahead of him. Just tell me already. If I figure it out, I figure it out.

Suspecting how it will turn out, however, doesn’t stop me from reading. I watched the rest of the Bones episode not because I had no idea who the killer was. I knew whodunnit. I wanted to watch the characters interact and put the puzzle together. I enjoyed seeing them solve the mystery.

Indeed, every fairy tale and romance novel has a happily ever after (HEA), and heroes consistently defeat villains. What the reader wants to know is how the characters will get there. Did you doubt that:

  • The Rebels would defeat the Empire and the good side of the Force would prevail?
  • Frodo would get the ring all the way to Mordor?
  • Sleeping Beauty would awaken with a kiss from her prince?
  • Hercule Poirot would use his little grey cells to uncover the culprit?
  • Batman would thwart the evil plans of Catwoman, the Joker, the Riddler, Mr. Freeze, or whichever villain-of-the-week was around?
  • Bella and Edward would find a way to be together forever?

Of course not. So is a predictable ending always a bad thing? No.

In fact, while I remember sitting in the theater watching The Empire Strikes Back and being wowed by Darth Vader’s revelation, my kids already knew about all of that. I knew the overall ending, but they knew the whole story and still wanted to watch every minute of the Star Wars trilogy.

It’s okay for a reader or viewer here and there to know whodunnit. But in that case, you have to give them another reason to read or watch.

Why do I continue? Because I care about the characters. This is why superhero movies continue to be made and remade and we continue to watch them. Why the boy meets girl, boy loses girl, boy gets girl back plot never gets old. Why we read or watch police procedural dramas, knowing that they will solve the case. We want to know how these particular characters resolve the conflict.

Perhaps we’re less interested in whodunnit than howdunnit.

I have to admit that seeing Psycho without knowing the ending will make you gasp (see Tiffany A. White and Catie Rhodes for reviews of that creepy film). The Murder of Roger Ackroyd is one of my favorite mysteries because Agatha Christie stunned me with the conclusion. And the last episode of Newhart was the most brilliant surprise ending for a TV series ever.

However, not knowing what will happen isn’t necessary to keep me turning pages or tuned in. Give me relatable characters that I can follow as they uncover the twists and turns of their lives, even if they end up where I suspected they would.

What about you? Do you enjoy surprise endings? Are you disappointed if you figure out the conclusion? Do you care more about whodunnit or howdunnit?

Friday Fiction: A Writing Doppelganger?

Barack Obama & Ilham Anas

Do you know what a doppelganger is?  I didn’t – that is, until an episode of How I Met Your Mother defined the word for me.  According to American Heritage Dictionary, however, a doppelganger is “a ghostly double or counterpart of a living person.”  It’s a person who looks almost exactly like you you know, your “long, lost twin.”

Tina Fey & Sarah Palin

I get that all the time.  Numerous times, I have had someone proclaim, “You look just like a girl I knew in college!” or “You look almost exactly like my third cousin!”  Which is perennially weird for me because I don’t anyone who looks like me.  (How many 5’3”, puny, dirty blonde females with small green eyes and large bumpy noses can there be out there?)  Regardless, I don’t mind being compared to others.  Or thinking that somewhere out there, my physical twin is roaming around and being greeted with, “You look just like this woman in Texas I met!”

What is interesting to me is wondering whether I’m anyone’s writing doppelganger.  Does every author have a slightly unique style or flavor to their writing?  Or do some people write exactly the same?

The “If you liked ___, then you’ll like ___” approach is built on the premise that authors are similar enough in topic or writing style that you can confidently recommend one based on the other.  Some of my favorite classic authors are not so easily qualified.  Who, for instance, writes exactly like Leo Tolstoy?  Or Jane Austen?  Or Agatha Christie? Do they have writing doppelgangers?

Agatha Christie & __________

Is it important even to be one of a kind?  Most of the novels I pick up are not are impactful as Anna Karenina or Pride and Prejudice, but I enjoy them all the same.  A recreational read over a weekend can be as deliciously delightful as an epic novel that requires a month to devour.  So if this mystery by Author x reminds me of another mystery by Author Y, is that a big deal?  Not really.

Do you know of some writing doppelgangers?  That is, have you come across an author that almost seemed to channel another author in their writing?  Did you like that or not? Do you compare your own writing to anyone else’s?